We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please check the example in https://github.com/InteractiveAdvertisingBureau/GDPR-Transparency-and-Consent-Framework/blob/master/TCFv2/IAB%20Tech%20Lab%20-%20Consent%20string%20and%20vendor%20list%20formats%20v2.md#example-global-vendor-list-json-object. A constraints is 'A Purpose id must not be present in both purposes and legIntPurposes'. But for the vendor with id 1 in the example, its purposes and legIntPurposes both contain purpose 2.
"1":{ "id": 1, "name": "Vendor Name", "purposes": [1, 2, 3, 9], "specialPurposes": [1], "legIntPurposes": [2], "flexiblePurposes": [1, 2], "features": [1, 2],
This may confuse the reader, I think. Please correct the example if possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for reporting this. I make that change along with some other pending changes.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Please check the example in https://github.com/InteractiveAdvertisingBureau/GDPR-Transparency-and-Consent-Framework/blob/master/TCFv2/IAB%20Tech%20Lab%20-%20Consent%20string%20and%20vendor%20list%20formats%20v2.md#example-global-vendor-list-json-object.
A constraints is 'A Purpose id must not be present in both purposes and legIntPurposes'.
But for the vendor with id 1 in the example, its purposes and legIntPurposes both contain purpose 2.
This may confuse the reader, I think. Please correct the example if possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: