Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recipe #103 -- Annotating a Poetry Reading #34

Closed
glenrobson opened this issue Dec 4, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Recipe #103 -- Annotating a Poetry Reading #34

glenrobson opened this issue Dec 4, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
Withdrawn Issue withdrawn from TRC discussion
Milestone

Comments

@glenrobson
Copy link
Member

Links

Background and Summary

This recipe covers the following use cases:

While an audio file of a poetry performance may be divided into a track for each poem, scholars may wish to use annotations to indicate aspects of the performance of a particular poem.

A researcher might want to annotate the following types of information:

  • structural information (introduction, title, stanzas)
  • points where the performer takes a breath
  • repeated phrases

Since annotations could be available at the same time the manifest is generated, or might be a separate process that references the item manifest, both scenarios are shown.

There is a third use case where manifests are unaware of annotations on them, but the systems that display the item are aware of the annotations and pull them in, using the target block in the annotation.

@glenrobson glenrobson added this to the December 2019 Call milestone Dec 4, 2019
@azaroth42
Copy link
Member

azaroth42 commented Dec 10, 2019

The recipe is not correct, as pointed out by @mejackreed on iiif-discuss.

See comments IIIF/cookbook-recipes#130 (review) and below

@glenrobson
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks to the work of Rob and Sara we have resolved most of the issues raised in the earlier comment. We are now working on the following comments:

IIIF/cookbook-recipes#130 (comment)

These may be resolved in time for the meeting but if not maybe we can discuss provisional approval if the changes are agreed they should be made.

@glenrobson
Copy link
Member Author

So in the meeting we discussed the recipe and felt it wasn't ready to be approved so we are withdrawing it from this round of the TRC and are going to work on it in January.

The specific reasons can be seen in the pull request commentary but relates to a misunderstanding (mine) around arrays for motivations and discussion on whether the recipe should only show one way of listing annotations either inline in the manifest or linked annotation list but not both.

@glenrobson glenrobson added the Withdrawn Issue withdrawn from TRC discussion label Jan 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Withdrawn Issue withdrawn from TRC discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants