Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add datasets counts to publishers page #68

Open
2 of 3 tasks
kimwdavidson opened this issue Mar 17, 2021 · 8 comments
Open
2 of 3 tasks

Add datasets counts to publishers page #68

kimwdavidson opened this issue Mar 17, 2021 · 8 comments
Assignees

Comments

@kimwdavidson
Copy link

kimwdavidson commented Mar 17, 2021

User Story

When I go to the publisher page, I want to see how many datasets are available from each publisher, so that I know how much information I can expect to find from them.

Background

This is currently available on DKAN1, and we found in user testing that users accustomed to DKAN1 miss this feature.

Acceptance Criteria

  • When I go to the publisher page

  • Then I see the number of datasets for each publisher on that page

  • Working downstream on Marine Scotland /groups

  • Working upstream (8.x branch) on /publishers

  • Working upstream to 2.0

Estimate: 8

PR

GetDKAN/data-catalog-components#140

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 17, 2021

@alexiscott This ticket has replaced #427. Can you estimate it please?

@alexiscott
Copy link
Contributor

alexiscott commented Mar 26, 2021

@rhabbachi Not quite there with this for Marine Scotland, but almost. I will send a message once this is ready. Thanks!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 29, 2021

From Alex on March 28th: "Hi @rhabbachi, just a heads up that I have added a PR for Marine Scotland (which should be easier for other sites - I added a description for that to the PR.) for ticket #68 here:
https://github.com/NuCivic/data-marine-scotland/pull/27#pullrequestreview-622774801"

@ghost ghost assigned rhabbachi and unassigned alexiscott Mar 29, 2021
@rhabbachi
Copy link
Contributor

Looks goods for marine scotland. @alexiscott do we need to do anything for the 2.x implementation?

@rhabbachi rhabbachi assigned alexiscott and unassigned rhabbachi Mar 30, 2021
@alexiscott
Copy link
Contributor

alexiscott commented Apr 5, 2021

Looks goods for marine scotland. @alexiscott do we need to do anything for the 2.x implementation?

Yes, work still needs to happen for 2.0. I know that @dgading had some thoughts on this and the approach for data in 2.0 is cross app and will work differently.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 5, 2021

@alexiscott @dgading Should we just create a new ticket for the 2.0 implementation or should we keep that in this ticket?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 7, 2021

Moved to the backlog because we need to check with Alex if the 2.0 implementation aspect of this ticket needs to be tracked in the Support or in the Product board.

@alexiscott
Copy link
Contributor

@cmugisha , that might be a question for @dgading

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants