You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I may have missed something, but it seems the graph generated is a flat graph showing the rendering of all components you add the HOC to. I have a tree of components all registered, and I wanted to see that the chid components are rendered only when they should be, but with the flat graph it's very difficult to see this. We give each one a unique screen name so could you not use a different colour per name, or a way to filter the graph per name?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a massively out of date response but yes this is a good idea, though we'd have to think about how that's presented since this aims to be as simple to follow as possible. When I use this I often just attach it to the root since I'm trying to improve performance at the screen level by adjusting particular components or sections of the screen.
I wonder if it might be better to just have a different graph all together for each component you wrap (maybe in tabs) as I think having bars of unrelated components is just noise.
I may have missed something, but it seems the graph generated is a flat graph showing the rendering of all components you add the HOC to. I have a tree of components all registered, and I wanted to see that the chid components are rendered only when they should be, but with the flat graph it's very difficult to see this. We give each one a unique screen name so could you not use a different colour per name, or a way to filter the graph per name?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: