You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A better architecture might be that the language model can determine possible methods to solve mathematical problems?Has anyone thought about this direction?
#100
A better architecture might be that the language model can determine possible methods to solve mathematical problems, then perform specific operations to transform the solution of the mathematical problem into a series of thoughts, fill the thought chain, and add generality in the transformation part to make the thinking more divergent, and then the part of filling the thought chain needs to be more accurate
It's a bit like the architecture of chatgpt+mathematica, but the problem with the chatgpt+mathematica architecture is that mathematica is too biased towards hard coding and often reports errors, and chatgpt does not specifically train to split the input of a mathematical problem into step-by-step solutions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A better architecture might be that the language model can determine possible methods to solve mathematical problems, then perform specific operations to transform the solution of the mathematical problem into a series of thoughts, fill the thought chain, and add generality in the transformation part to make the thinking more divergent, and then the part of filling the thought chain needs to be more accurate
It's a bit like the architecture of chatgpt+mathematica, but the problem with the chatgpt+mathematica architecture is that mathematica is too biased towards hard coding and often reports errors, and chatgpt does not specifically train to split the input of a mathematical problem into step-by-step solutions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: