Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explicit fitness sharing vs linear ranking selection #8

Open
sopotc opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Explicit fitness sharing vs linear ranking selection #8

sopotc opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@sopotc
Copy link
Contributor

sopotc commented Oct 22, 2024

From reading the code, it appears that the way that the speciate function is done in the neat algorithm is by assigning offsprings based on the linear ranking selection of species.

However, in my understanding of the NEAT paper, explicit fitness sharing is used to distribute offspring reproduction among species. Thus, the reproduction opportunities for species are proportional to their adjusted fitness, rather than to the rank of their fitness. This is an important distinction, as it could project considerable smoothing and impact performance.

I'm curious if you did any ablation, or whether something specific motivated you to move away from explicit fitness sharing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant