Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TIED contact and beam won’t converge in CCX 2.17-2.21 #83

Open
victorkemp opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

TIED contact and beam won’t converge in CCX 2.17-2.21 #83

victorkemp opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@victorkemp
Copy link

victorkemp commented Apr 30, 2024

It worked OK in 2.16 but not subsequent versions. The contact isn’t on the beam element but just coexists on other elements in the same file.

image

*NODE
1,1,-0.5,0
2,0,-0.5,2
3,1,0.5,0
4,1,-0.5,2
5,0,0.5,2
6,1,-0.5,4
7,1,-0.5,2
8,1,0.5,2
9,0,-0.5,0
10,0,0.5,0
11,1,0.5,4
12,0,0.5,2
13,1,0.5,2
14,0,0.5,4
15,0,-0.5,2
16,4,0,4
17,0,-0.5,4
18,4,0,0
*ELEMENT,TYPE=C3D8,ELSET=SOLID
1,9,1,3,10,15,7,13,5
3,2,4,8,12,17,6,11,14
*ELEMENT,TYPE=B31,ELSET=BEAM
2,18,16
*SURFACE,NAME=BONDED_CONTACT_FACES(2)
3,S1
*SURFACE,NAME=BONDED_CONTACT_FACES
1,S2
*MATERIAL,NAME=MATERIAL
*ELASTIC,TYPE=ISOTROPIC
200000000000,0
*SOLID SECTION,ELSET=SOLID,MATERIAL=MATERIAL
*BEAM SECTION,ELSET=BEAM,MATERIAL=MATERIAL,SECTION=RECT
1,1
0,1,0
*BOUNDARY
1,1,3,0
3,1,3,0
9,1,3,0
10,1,3,0
18,1,6,0
*CONTACT PAIR,INTERACTION=SI_1,TYPE=SURFACE TO SURFACE,ADJUST=57.44562646538
BONDED_CONTACT_FACES(2),BONDED_CONTACT_FACES
*SURFACE INTERACTION,NAME=SI_1
*SURFACE BEHAVIOR,PRESSURE-OVERCLOSURE=TIED
1000000000000,1
*FRICTION
1,1000000000000
*STEP
*STATIC
*CLOAD
17,2,125000
6,2,125000
11,2,125000
14,2,125000
16,2,500000
*NODE FILE
U
*END STEP

https://calculix.discourse.group/t/tied-contact-and-beam-wont-converge-in-ccx-2-17/2236

@stefano2734
Copy link

stefano2734 commented Jan 17, 2025

Actual is version 2.22. this behavior in 2.22 also?

Yes, than you can edit the title of the issue to 2.22

@victorkemp
Copy link
Author

Yes, 2.22 also.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants