You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've seen similar issues in the case of bars meshed with tetrahedral elements but only in buckling/frequency analyses. This model is a thin-walled closed cylinder meshed with S6 elements. It's loaded with gravity, bending force at the free end and external pressure on the whole cylindrical surface. The results are incorrect when using CalculiX newer than 2.17 unless Pardiso is selected:
I've seen similar issues in the case of bars meshed with tetrahedral elements but only in buckling/frequency analyses. This model is a thin-walled closed cylinder meshed with S6 elements. It's loaded with gravity, bending force at the free end and external pressure on the whole cylindrical surface. The results are incorrect when using CalculiX newer than 2.17 unless Pardiso is selected:
It also works with first-order elements.
Here's the input file: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/7q9eu4lqqrtrcrn413vki/FEMMeshGmsh.inp?rlkey=4eo15kp9gd71q7n51029506j7&st=o7o9cagn&dl=0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: