You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Within the kenmerkendewaarden project, some extremes timeseries raised "Exception: tidal wave numbering: HW numbers not always increasing". This was often due to invalid additional extremes reported in Rijkswaterstaat/wm-ws-dl#43. However, at least for IJMBTHVN, there is a valid but strongly asymmetric extreme that causes this error.
It is only an issue after shifting the timezone (which is what happens in kw.calc_gemiddeldgetij()), but it comes from hatyan.calc_HWLWnumbering() already. So even if for kenmerkendewaarden we move to another way of matching culminations and extremes, we will probably want to solve this in hatyan.
If we shift the timeseries with 1 hour (which is done in kw.calc_havengetallen()) it raises "Exception: tidal wave numbering: HW numbers not always increasing" because HW 12737 is interpreted as HW 12738:
Note: in #311, it was also noted that hatyan.calc_HWLWnumbering() fails for "long 1870-2024 timeseries for HOEKVHLD, even not when providing station argument".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Within the kenmerkendewaarden project, some extremes timeseries raised
"Exception: tidal wave numbering: HW numbers not always increasing"
. This was often due to invalid additional extremes reported in Rijkswaterstaat/wm-ws-dl#43. However, at least for IJMBTHVN, there is a valid but strongly asymmetric extreme that causes this error.It is only an issue after shifting the timezone (which is what happens in
kw.calc_gemiddeldgetij()
), but it comes fromhatyan.calc_HWLWnumbering()
already. So even if for kenmerkendewaarden we move to another way of matching culminations and extremes, we will probably want to solve this in hatyan.Gives:
If we shift the timeseries with 1 hour (which is done in kw.calc_havengetallen()) it raises
"Exception: tidal wave numbering: HW numbers not always increasing"
because HW 12737 is interpreted as HW 12738:Note: in #311, it was also noted that
hatyan.calc_HWLWnumbering()
fails for "long 1870-2024 timeseries for HOEKVHLD, even not when providing station argument".The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: