You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issues:
xfac=True (empirisch) according to compfile, but xfac=False would be better according to AB/KD. Accidentally already added to stats_xfac0 in example files. Prevent mixing of xfac=False components with xfac=True prediction:
L9PFM
Q1
Empirisch/theoretisch is not mentioned in component file (so assuming xfac=True), but xfac=False resulted in good reproductions of components/prediction. Indeed theoretical f/u were used according to KD:
AUKFPFM
CUXHVN
K13APFM
NORTHCMRT (although "theor. f" for SA/SM)
This can be tested with xfac = COMP_merged.xfac in predictie_2019_frommergedcomp.py. If conclusive, update stats_xfac0 in example scripts and maybe update excel file. Comparing metadata is possible with:
Issues:
xfac=True (empirisch) according to compfile, but xfac=False would be better according to AB/KD. Accidentally already added to
stats_xfac0
in example files. Prevent mixing of xfac=False components with xfac=True prediction:Empirisch/theoretisch is not mentioned in component file (so assuming xfac=True), but xfac=False resulted in good reproductions of components/prediction. Indeed theoretical f/u were used according to KD:
This can be tested with
xfac = COMP_merged.xfac
inpredictie_2019_frommergedcomp.py
. If conclusive, updatestats_xfac0
in example scripts and maybe update excel file. Comparing metadata is possible with:After fix, also re-enable in acceptance tests again:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: