You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Another quirk of the observation dates appears to be a discrepancy between how calculation points are placed in time. In the following situation, the filters start at t = 1, the Head Observation is set at t = 0,9 and t = 1,9, and the ttim Computations times are set at t = 1 and t = 2.
What appears to happen is Head Observations are attributed to the time period up to t = 1, whereas the raster calculation is attributed to to the time period following the computation point ( t = 1 to t = 2 ). This results in the contour plot 'lagging' the head monitor by 1 day:
It would appear logical to me if the Head Observation points are attributed to the time period following the calculation moment (like the rasters), not the preceding period.
See image of this drawdown. t=0 results in the right value (10.0), but it should be placed at Monday 15 0:00, not at 2:00.
All the dates seem somewhat shifted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: