Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Observation dates seem off #151

Open
Huite opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Observation dates seem off #151

Huite opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Huite
Copy link
Contributor

Huite commented Apr 22, 2024

See image of this drawdown. t=0 results in the right value (10.0), but it should be placed at Monday 15 0:00, not at 2:00.

image

All the dates seem somewhat shifted.

@CGoudswaard
Copy link

Another quirk of the observation dates appears to be a discrepancy between how calculation points are placed in time. In the following situation, the filters start at t = 1, the Head Observation is set at t = 0,9 and t = 1,9, and the ttim Computations times are set at t = 1 and t = 2.

What appears to happen is Head Observations are attributed to the time period up to t = 1, whereas the raster calculation is attributed to to the time period following the computation point ( t = 1 to t = 2 ). This results in the contour plot 'lagging' the head monitor by 1 day:

image

image

It would appear logical to me if the Head Observation points are attributed to the time period following the calculation moment (like the rasters), not the preceding period.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants