You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently the bridge macro requires effectivity satellite table details to be declared. Not all hubs and links come with a satellite node, therefore it would be nice for the macro to work without satellite details.
Describe the solution you'd like
Optional dependency of effectivity satellites in bridge creation.
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A.
Additional context
This would likely affect the behavior in bridge_shared and potentially bridge.sql.
Hello!
With the release of v0.11.0 today you may have seen we've deprecated the bridge() macro.
I just wanted to assure you not to panic about this! This is the first step to our planned re-work, which will still include this feature, among others.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently the bridge macro requires effectivity satellite table details to be declared. Not all hubs and links come with a satellite node, therefore it would be nice for the macro to work without satellite details.
Describe the solution you'd like
Optional dependency of effectivity satellites in bridge creation.
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A.
Additional context
This would likely affect the behavior in bridge_shared and potentially bridge.sql.
Docs: tut_bridges
AB#5343
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: