You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are use cases of the "Supported" type of ReadRequirement that could be tested reliably - meaning that the requirement isn't dependent on the configuration of the system under test. For those cases, it would be good to increase the validator's coverage.
The testing would be similar to the process for "AllOf" comparisons - if after checking every resource, the "Supported" property isn't found, it would be a failure. As long as the property is found at least once, it would pass.
Probably need a option/flag on how to handle these, though (warning or failure) so that hardware or configuration-dependent properties don't cause false failures.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are use cases of the "Supported" type of
ReadRequirement
that could be tested reliably - meaning that the requirement isn't dependent on the configuration of the system under test. For those cases, it would be good to increase the validator's coverage.The testing would be similar to the process for "AllOf" comparisons - if after checking every resource, the "Supported" property isn't found, it would be a failure. As long as the property is found at least once, it would pass.
Probably need a option/flag on how to handle these, though (warning or failure) so that hardware or configuration-dependent properties don't cause false failures.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: