From f7e5bc9b64acef804bb6069be195cb046a130b9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuko Munakata <58264197+yukomunakata@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:41:56 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] clarify 4.9 should use normalized patients' data

---
 ch6/attn/README.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ch6/attn/README.md b/ch6/attn/README.md
index 25e42f9..bf2953b 100644
--- a/ch6/attn/README.md
+++ b/ch6/attn/README.md
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Now, we lesion the model, and see if it simulates the patient's data. However, b
 
 > **Question 6.8:** Report the resulting averages from the `TrialStats` table.
 
-> **Question 6.9:** Compute the invalid-valid difference, and compare it first with that same difference in the intact network, and then with the patient's data as discussed above.
+> **Question 6.9:** Compute the invalid-valid difference, and compare it first with that same difference in the intact network, and then with the normalized patient's data as discussed above (418-350=68ms).
 
 You should have found that you can simulate the apparent disengage deficit without having a specific "disengager" mechanism (at least qualitatively).