-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provider site reference table: #7
Comments
Sites and providers each have several of their own datasets. As with waivers, I think addresses (and sometimes also phone) are the key link between providers and sites. The relationship is probably better handled with views than a table per se. Could we try loading sites tables together when we meet in a few days? |
Related to issue #10 By Sept 3 AM (EDT), will provide separate spreadsheet tabs for at least two _listings ("rec") tables: SITES PROVIDERS |
@Joeyloganpython, should the new data loads for provider _listings incorporate the P-----## IDs already generated in the test loads or let postgreSQL generate them afresh? -- sites table itself is needed to generate site IDs, but has similar chicken/egg issue as providers (rough model, don't use as-is) |
@Joeyloganpython, @atzbencam: Here are the sheets for nearly load-ready datasets -- one tab per table. Could we look them over tomorrow? Should the new data loads for provider _listings incorporate the P-----## IDs already generated in the test loads or let postgreSQL generate them afresh? |
Closing this issue to declutter -- will echo keeper points in updated issue for DB 2.0 (Jan/Feb 2021) |
Deploy siterecs map and basic map filter
There is a table that relates many sites to many providers and vice vera: Is there some sort of data for this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: