You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On the participate as a developer page, the section 'Contribute to an Open Source Project' has an icon saying 'Find out how to Contribute'. Unlike the two other icons, this is not a link, but an email link with a mailto:, which automatically opens a draft email in the client's default mailer.
I'm not sure if this is the best way to encourage contribution. I don't know what to write in that email, or who it is going to.
Something like the contribute.md boilerplate would be a better introduction, in that I could learn whether I can bug triage, develop, fork, etc.
I'm not saying this isn't the right way to do it; just, there may be alternatives that will more actively encourage contribution. What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@RichardLitt Thank you for the suggestion. You make a good point.
I like the idea of linking to a contributing document. We currently have developer docs, but as it stands, these are more for internal use than for community use. @JeffSpies@erinspace Thoughts on drafting a contribution guide for 3rd-party contributors? Perhaps we revise the index page of our internal dev docs to make them more public-facing?
On the participate as a developer page, the section 'Contribute to an Open Source Project' has an icon saying 'Find out how to Contribute'. Unlike the two other icons, this is not a link, but an email link with a
mailto:
, which automatically opens a draft email in the client's default mailer.I'm not sure if this is the best way to encourage contribution. I don't know what to write in that email, or who it is going to.
Something like the contribute.md boilerplate would be a better introduction, in that I could learn whether I can bug triage, develop, fork, etc.
I'm not saying this isn't the right way to do it; just, there may be alternatives that will more actively encourage contribution. What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: