Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]Rework BioCollections #95

Open
2 of 8 tasks
kMutagene opened this issue Jun 22, 2020 · 0 comments
Open
2 of 8 tasks

[Feature Request]Rework BioCollections #95

kMutagene opened this issue Jun 22, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
FeatureRequest project-Core Issues regarding the BioFSharp project

Comments

@kMutagene
Copy link
Member

kMutagene commented Jun 22, 2020

BioSeq, BioArray, and BioList have inconsistent function naming and missing functionality:

different functionality:

  • (Naming) transcribeCodingStrand/transcribeCodeingStrand (BioSeq/BioArray)
  • (function signature) Digestion.[CollectionName].digest

missing functionality:

  • conversion the same as standard collections: BioSeq.ofBioArray etc.

  • create cDNA from mRNA

  • find first start codon

  • find gene (first start codon –> first stop codon)

  • all functions with the signature kind collection -> .. -> collection need to be abstracted, e.g. BioArray.map

  • (Debatable, Breaking): put the types in the toplevel namespace and make the functions static members. Has the advantage of less namespace Clutter (BioFSharp.BioSeq.BioSeq<#IBioItem> becomes BioFSharp.BioSeq<#IBioItem>)

@kMutagene kMutagene added FeatureRequest project-Core Issues regarding the BioFSharp project labels Jun 22, 2020
@kMutagene kMutagene mentioned this issue Jun 26, 2020
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FeatureRequest project-Core Issues regarding the BioFSharp project
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant