Final Project Feedback + Score

[ShanEllis]

Background & Question (-0) | Good use of citations

Data & Wrangling (-0) | Data wrangling is clear. Concise explanations + sufficient commenting.

EDA (-0) | EDA is very strong! Lots of excellent plots here. All of your plots are well formatted and explained.

Analysis (-0) | Models are interpreted correctly and plots included here are helpful to the reader for understanding results. Nice ANOVA test!

Discussion & Conclusion (-0) | Good discussion of limitations and potential extensions!

Overall (-0) | Very well done!

Presentation (-0) | Well designed presentation. Not too much text on slides!
Notes |

Background & Question - Background: explains necessary background on topic chosen (1) - Citations: includes citations as needed (0.5) - Questions: clearly spells out question(s) being answered (1)	Data & Wrangling - Dataset: Describes dataset being used in necessary detail (0.5) - Text: includes sufficient text to guide the viewer throughout - including introduction/citation of the dataset (0.75) - Code : includes clear code and sufficient comments to guide the viewer (0.75) - Wrangling: wrangles all datasets into usable format or displays dataset demonstrating further wrangling not needed (0.5)	EDA - EDA: plots generated help reader fully understand data being used (1) - Viz: plots are well-designed (clear from visualization what's being plotted - i.e. axes labeled, stuff big enough, colors clear, etc. (1) - Code: includes clear code and sufficient comments to guide the viewer (0.5) - Explanations: text/interpretation included is correct/helpful (0.5)	Analysis - Analyses: analysis carried out are accurate and answer the questions posed (1) - Code: includes clear code and sufficient comments to guide the viewer (0.75) - Explanations: explanations are clear and include necessary level of detail (0.75) - Interpretations: interpretations are included/accurate/correct and put in context of question being asked (0.5)	Conclusion/Discussion - Results: summarized clearly an in context of questions asked (0.5) - limitations of their analysis and/or future directions are discussed (0.5)	Overall - Storytelling: Makes sense from start to finish (0.5) - Clarity: Is generally well-written, concise, and there aren't too many typos (1.5)	Presentation Summarizes the analysis clearly (0.5) Is 3-5 min in length (0.4) Employs effective oral communication overall (1) Employs effective communication about visuals/data (1)	Points
2.5	2.5	3	3	1	2	2.9	16.9