You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for opening source the great work, CLINS.
Browsing the code, I have a question about the QuadraticIntegralFactor.
First, its usage in the codebase has been commented out, so it seems the factor is not used at all.
Second, according to the comment, its implementation refers to the segmentQuadraticIntegralDiag in Kalibr. However, the kalibr uses a weight matrix Q of size Dim * SplineOrder, whereas CLINS uses a Q of size SplineOrder * SplineOrder. The kalibr implementation apparently follows the derivation in the Sec 4.6 of paper.
Third, to my understanding, the derivation in Kalibr for quadratic integral is for ordinary B-splines on the Euclidean space. That is, it is probably not suitable for cumulative B-splines on Lie groups, esp. SO3 B splines.
So does this QuadraticIntegralFactor in CLINS work in your experience or thinking?
Thanks for your consideration,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear authors,
Thank you for opening source the great work, CLINS.
Browsing the code, I have a question about the QuadraticIntegralFactor.
First, its usage in the codebase has been commented out, so it seems the factor is not used at all.
Second, according to the comment, its implementation refers to the segmentQuadraticIntegralDiag in Kalibr. However, the kalibr uses a weight matrix Q of size Dim * SplineOrder, whereas CLINS uses a Q of size SplineOrder * SplineOrder. The kalibr implementation apparently follows the derivation in the Sec 4.6 of paper.
Third, to my understanding, the derivation in Kalibr for quadratic integral is for ordinary B-splines on the Euclidean space. That is, it is probably not suitable for cumulative B-splines on Lie groups, esp. SO3 B splines.
So does this QuadraticIntegralFactor in CLINS work in your experience or thinking?
Thanks for your consideration,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: