Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is it good on moderate-frequency IMU? #2

Open
JaySlamer opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Is it good on moderate-frequency IMU? #2

JaySlamer opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@JaySlamer
Copy link

On your paper, it says it was experimented on 400hz and 200hz IMU data. I am currently using a 100 hz IMU from my INS. Can I still get good calibration result from using your codebase?
@arjunskumar
Copy link

@You-zeyi have you got the better results?

@pedestrain123
Copy link

@JaySlamer 您好请问您试了这个标定算法了吗？标定结果如何

@JaySlamer
Copy link
Author

@You-zeyi have you got the better results?

no, the result is horrible. I have already left the company and project.

@JaySlamer
Copy link
Author

@JaySlamer 您好请问您试了这个标定算法了吗？标定结果如何

结果很糟糕，已经被裁员，不在那个项目了

@pedestrain123
Copy link

@JaySlamer 好的感谢您的回复，您有用过opencalib的lidar2ins自动标定算法吗？基于balm的

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@JaySlamer @pedestrain123 @arjunskumar